這則總結原是上週的文章,本來剛好在 2021.12.31 發表,卻因為《立場新聞》被逼停刊,臨時改為分享對於立場和 metaverse 的看法。然後沒幾天,又輪到《眾新聞》被逼停刊,還不只,較不受公眾關注的還有《香港獨媒新聞》、《IBHK網絡媒體》、《癲狗日報》、《夠薑媒體》及《聚言時報》也於一週內相繼停辦。關注公民媒體的我明明好應該紀錄點甚麼,卻發現對此已經毫無能力書寫。
(閱讀全文…)Blog
-

基金會註銷不是 LikeCoin 要結束,而是向前往 DAO 邁進一大步
零、註冊於香港的 LikeCoin Foundation Limited 已於 2021.12.10 刊登憲報撤銷,正式解散。
(閱讀全文…) -

LikeCoin DAO 公投表決中:Liker 可自由選擇投贊成、反對、棄權、否決,或者不投票
LikeCoin DAO 議案 25、26 公投表決中,所有 Likers 可以自由決定是否參與。如果投票,除了可以選擇贊成、反對、否決,還可以投棄權。
借這個機會,我再次詳細介紹「讚賞公民共和國」的整個治理流程。
(閱讀全文…) -

提案空投 LikeCoin 予 Cosmos 社群及讚賞公民
A proposal raised to the Republic of Liker Land, regarding a fairdrop campaign of 50,000,000 LIKE to the Cosmos Community and Civic Likers.
*Update: A rectified proposal #25 had been raised. Updated the parameter of the calculation formula. Removed claiming task to add LP to keep the claiming missions to 4 tasks.
Objectives
- Giving back to the community
- Promoting to the world
Since the inception in 2017, LikeCoin has always been aiming for mass adoption. Majority of Likers are content creators, reporters, independent media and readers. Given their background in content creation, most Likers have little to no previous knowledge on cryptocurrencies, and may not have heard of blockchain at all. As a result, tremendous efforts have been spent to empower Likers with crypto-related knowledge. Personally i have also founded the #decentralizehk movement, with a mission to educate the public on decentralization.
Ironically, as a result, LikeCoin is lesser known to native crypto users. As of the time of writing, there are 1,494,240 pieces of content registered by 26,521 active wallet addresses on 8,078 media outlets in the Republic of Liker Land. Together, they are rewarded 49,305,743 LIKE. These are not small numbers in the crypto world. But since our previous efforts have been so focused on content creators, the adoption in the layman world is unmatched by the awareness in the crypto world.
Following the launch of ISCN, activation of IBC and onboarding on Osmosis and Emeris, we believe it is the right time to give back to the Cosmos community and let the world aware of LikeCoin, the decentralized publishing infrastructure.
Other than being a “Hello, world”, the fairdrop also serves as a give-back to the community, without which LikeCoin would not have existed.
Target Audience
- ATOM and OSMO holders, delegators and liquidity providers
- Civic Liker
With its genesis in 2019.11.15, LikeCoin chain is based on Cosmos SDK, and LIKE is being traded on Osmosis and Emeris with LIKE/OSMO and LIKE/ATOM being major liquidity pools. We are very thankful for what the community had offered, and believe it makes most sense to fairdrop to ATOM and OSMO holders, delegators and liquidity providers. We’ve taken the snapshot on 2021.11.30 which is the latest possible moment to include as many benefiters as possible.
On the other hand, thousands of Civic Likers have voluntarily been rewarding creators in the ecosystem with LIKE they sponsored in fiat. They are doing it for no particular reason but support creativity and journalism. As a gratitude, we also propose to include all the Civic Likers since 2019.01.01 till 2021.11.30 in the fairdrop.
Budget
- ATOM holders, delegators and liquidity providers: 20,000,000 LIKE
- OSMO holders, delegators and liquidity providers: 20,000,000 LIKE
- Civic Likers: 10,000,000 LIKE
which makes the total 50,000,000 LIKE, or 4.67% of issued LIKE. The budget will be paid from the Community Pool, if this proposal is passed.
The claiming is expected to start in 2022 Q1 and will last for 180 days. Since the 91st day, unclaimed fairdrop will decay linearly until it reaches 0 on the 181st day.
Unclaimed LIKE will be returned to the Community Pool.
Distribution methodology
- Quadratic fairdrop: to reduce inequality, the fairdrop amount will be proportional to the square root of the number of ATOM & OSMO owned/delegated/pooled
- To reward delegators and liquidity providers, amounts of ATOM and OSMO delegated or pooled are 10x multiplied, with the exception of delegation to centralized exchanges
- For practicality, the minimum amount eligible is 0.1 for both ATOM and OSMO, and minimum amount of fairdrop received is floored at 8 LIKE
- For Civic Likers, the amount of fairdrop is proportional to the amount of LIKE they sponsored indirectly with fiat. Effectively, the earlier they started and the longer they sponsored, the more fairdrop they are eligible
- For ATOM holders, delegators and liquidity providers:
claimable LIKE = 8 + 4.6090751814769835 * (unstaked ATOM + 10 * staked ATOM + 10 * pooled ATOM)^0.5
provided that (unstaked ATOM + 10 * staked ATOM + 10 * pooled ATOM) >= 0.1, otherwise claimable LIKE = 0 - For OSMO holders, delegators and liquidity providers:
claimable LIKE = 8 + 5.7111829292719225 * (unstaked OSMO + 10 * staked OSMO + 10 * pooled OSMO)^0.5
provided that (unstaked OSMO + 10 * staked OSMO + 10 * pooled OSMO >= 0.1, otherwise claimable LIKE = 0 - For Civic Liker:
claimable LIKE = 0.316436501826204 * total LIKE sponsored - The snapshot of ATOM was taken at block height 8,529,628 (2021.11.30)
- The snapshot of OSMO was taken at block height 2,195,471 (2021.11.30)
- The period of Civic Liker used was 2019.01.01, i.e. day 1, till 2021.11.30
- There are 243,069 ATOM wallets and 114,809 OSMO wallets eligible for the fairdrop. Combined, there are 286,744 unique wallets
- In total, 5,268 Civic Likers are eligible for the fairdrop
Gamified Claiming
To introduce the utilities of LIKE and just for the fun of it, benefiters of the fairdrop will go through a 5-step gamified flow, claiming 20% of the total amount at each step.
- Visit stake.like.co and add LikeCoin to Keplr
- Delegate some LIKE to a validator on stake.like.co
- Vote in a proposal on dao.like.co
- (Updated) Publish a tweet on depub.space
- (removed) Add liquidity to LIKE/OSMO or LIKE/ATOM on Osmosis, or LIKE/ATOM on Emeris*
Upon the approval of the proposal by the Republic of Liker Land, 50,000,000 LIKE will be transferred from the Community Pool to cosmos19gxt5gg8mxglzthjs2zezvdccexnekv2vm8l35, a 2 of 3 multisig wallet among Edmond Yu, Chung Wu and kin ko (myself), all being co-founders of LikeCoin, for further processing.
The implementation and operation of the fairdrop will be carried out by the Liker Land team.
-

想為發行 NFT 作好準備,該怎樣保障作品的產權?
當「師園鹹酥雞」也發行 NFT 而且暴漲 350 倍,鳳梨酥也發 NFT,地球人似乎已經沒法阻擋 NFT 入侵全球。這陣子傳染力最強的不是 COVID,而是 NFT,不發一個或者買一下 NFT,似乎比不打疫苗所受的群眾壓力還大。
如果你是創作者,應該怎設定作品的著作權,來為他日發行 NFT 作好準備?
「All rights reserved」是物理世界的古早概念
如果你的答案是在作品大字標明「All rights reserved」、「未經授權,不得使用」之類,很抱歉,你還活在上一世紀,完全沒有 get 到 NFT 的意義在哪。
先來說一個客觀事實。很多人都知道,本年三月,Beeple 的 NFT 作品 Everydays – The First 5000 Days 透過佳士得拍賣,拍得 6 千 9 百萬美元,為歷史上第三高價的藝術品。但很少人注意的是,Beeple 的大部分作品,都是透過 Creative Commons 共享創意(台:創用 CC)授權釋出。
在訪問中,Beeple 說:
I think creating stuff and giving it away for free is something that just comes naturally to me for some reason. If there is something that I’ve worked really hard on, I want as many people to see it as possible so giving it away is the easiest way to facilitate that…
While it is obviously true that most people will not pay for something that they can get for free, there exists a large amount of counter points to that argument on sites like Patreon where people give money free to people whose work they enjoy. I think sometimes people concentrate a little too much on trying to come up with some great business model when they should be focusing a bit more on their craft.
事實上,Beeple Instagram 帳號 @beeple_crap 的描述就已清楚寫著:
art shit for yer facehole. —
14 years of everydays / free Creative Commons visuals顯然,把作品鎖起來,「All rights reserved」的古早做法,並非發行 NFT 的先決條件。相反的做法才更貼近事實:Beeple 的作品能拍賣到 6 千 9 百萬,正正是由於他樂意把大部分作品開放,促進流通。
我去 7-Eleven 買瓶子
很多人戲稱 NFT 不過是 jpg。對此,其實我同意有些 NFT 作品不過就是 jpg,僅此而已(但也可能賣出我一生都賺不到的高價啊 🙄 ),但是總的來說,NFT 承載的從來就不是作品本身,而是背後的意義。至於具體的意義是甚麼,各種專案有千百種玩法,這裡先不展開,重點是,NFT 持有人可以得到甚麼,是創作者和策展人賦予的,而作品本身帶有甚麼意義,則是作品跟社會互動中產生的。而 NFT,其實是領福利的憑證,以及社會意義的載體。
NFT 這個「意義載體」的出現,就好像歷史上瓶子的發明,讓水得以承載、運送和交易。沒有瓶子,水還是水,意義沒有減少,但就沒法被保存起來,沒法傳送,更沒法泡成茶、煲成湯。當我們買可樂,我們想要的是飲料本身而不是瓶子,所以其實,說「買 NFT」就像是說「我去 7-Eleven 買瓶子」般奇怪,只不過人類還沒發展出足夠豐富的詞彙,也沒沉澱足夠的共識去描述買賣的到底是甚麼而已。
不厭其煩的說:NFT 的交易,重點不在作品本身,而是作品背後的意義。如果作品是張 jpg,你買的不是 jpg,而是這張 jpg 背後的意義。換言之,如果這張 jpg 背後並無意義,你的確就是在買 jpg。
到此,答案呼之欲出了。作品的意義,往往不是在作品完成那一刻產生,反而是完成後跟受眾,跟世界,跟整個歷史脈絡互動而產生。把作品「All rights reserved」,等同於完成一幅畫作後鎖到櫃子,所有人得問准畫家才能看看它,這幅畫跟世界的互動當然有限,產生各種意義的機會率也非常低。
返回開首的例子,Beeple 只會在替客戶訂製作品時才會收起內容,其他時候,都是開放授權。如果 Beeple 把每天發表,持續了 14 年多的 Everydays 作品收起來,那麼持續了 5000 多天的 Everydays 就算是 mint 成 NFT,也沒有太大意義,更不可能賣出史上第三高價。
萬維網:開放就是意義本身
作品、開放、背後的意義、載體,一連串的概念或許有點抽象,我嘗試再套一個例子去解釋。
本年六月,Sir Tim Berners-Lee 於 1989 年發明 WWW(world wide web)時的代碼獲製作成 NFT,並以 5 百 40 萬美元賣出,款項給予 Sir Tim 指定的慈善機構。
這個例子更能說明整個邏輯,以及開放的關鍵。WWW 背後的意義就是全球整個開放互聯的萬維網,我們每個人每天都在享用他帶來的好處。WWW 整個發明,一直都是開放而且免費的,而正是因為他開放,才有今天的成就,要是當年 Sir Tim 選擇以專利等「保護」這項發明,他絕對不會成為今天的萬維網,而 Sir Tim 也不會成功到哪裡去。而三十二年後,由於 NFT 的出現,發明 WWW 這份價值得以被承載並拍賣,Sir Tim 甚至更進一步把善款 pay it forward,造福人群。而以上一切的發生,都沒有以鎖起作品為代價,封鎖作品不單只沒有保護作品,更會殺掉作品的意義。
作為創作者,保護作品是一份應有的權利,無可厚非。但是如果以為鎖起作品是他日發行 NFT 的準備工夫,卻是徹頭徹尾的捉錯用神。在數位世界——或者如果你想時髦一點,大可以說在元宇宙——保護產權需要的不是禁止別人複製,而是避免託管,自己持有作品源頭的私鑰,避免無良的「copy-minter」冒充自己發行 NFT,盜取作品背後的意義。要做到這種效果,創作者可以申請作品的「出生證明」,以區塊鏈見證自己是其生父母,LikeCoin 的 ISCN international standard content number,說穿了就是作品的出生證明。
作品跟人一樣,都各有自己的命運,作品的生父母沒法確保子女成為經典,但至少可以避免壓制他,改而放飛他。效法 Sir Tim Berners-Lee 和 Beeple,把代碼和作品開放授權,讓資訊流動,讓作品跟世界互動,才有可能成就一份傳奇。
免費訂閱《DHK 郵報》,每逢週四文章直達郵箱。
付費成為「道友 Pro」,加入 Signal 討論群,每月獲 DHK 空投,每年獲得贈書,不定期參與專屬活動。收入全歸 DHK dao,從事 web3 公民教育。
延伸閱讀
- 致蘋果日報:請把授權全面開放,讓內容得以永續
- LF2 念念不忘 NFT 必有迴響
- Art 呃・瘋狂的石頭・NFT
- 《區塊鏈社會學》NFT
- 左而不膠 淺談開放商業模式
- 共享創意全球峰會 2019 隨筆
- 數位內容身份證:從 ISBN 到 ISCN
- 假如你擁有超能力讓一段文字永遠流傳,會選甚麼?我們的答案是〈賽博空間獨立宣言〉
- 香港電台 1973 年以來六千多段影片已永存於區塊鏈
- DePub 教室:示範區塊鏈出版
我的文章不為圖利設限,全部開放閱讀。如你喜歡本文,請收集它的 Writing NFT,支持寫作,保育新聞。
-

士多啤梨蘋果橙 以物易物現代版
無大台交易所透過流動性池,讓 APPLE 和 BANANA 可以隨時兌換,換言之,為蘋果和香蕉提供了流動性,讓果農的產出得以跟其他蔬果互換。既然 APPLE 跟 BANANA 之間可以,推而廣之,CARROT、DURIAN、EGGPLANT 之間也一樣可以。
人類走過了一萬年,因為區塊鏈的出現,竟然再次回到以物易物的年代。
(閱讀全文…) -

liquidity 到底是甚麼?用人話談「流動性」的常識
密碼貨幣媒體經常提到「流動性」,但很少會解釋它。反過來,讀者會視它為常用詞,覺得不用深究隱約都懂,但要自己去說清楚,又好像不知從何說起。
讓我嘗試用人話,聊聊「流動性」是甚麼,如何衡量,背後又有甚麼意義。
(閱讀全文…) -

我領到十萬多鎂空投後學懂的十件事
Ethereum Name Service 前天空投 $ENS,雖然金額在區塊鏈史上並非最高,但配合最近 $BTC、$ETH 等大幣的 ATH,從 Domain Name Service DNS 到 ENS 又很好懂,公眾關注度史無前例地高。
我領過大大小小的各種密碼貨幣空投,小的連 gas fee 都不夠付,比較大額的如 $UNI、$GTC、$DYDX 和 $ENS 則比較可觀,碰巧四個都是以太坊生態的基礎服務,都以回饋早期使用者的方式空投,配給我的幣碰巧都值兩萬多鎂,加起來共十萬多鎂,我因此把他們統稱「空投四小強」。
(閱讀全文…)



